View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Toraton n00b
Joined: 29 Sep 2003 Posts: 17 Location: Federal Way, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 1:49 am Post subject: "No suitable terminal device found." |
|
|
Here's a post I recently made at DevShed:
http://forums.devshed.com/t87191/s.html
If that doesn't work it's under Forums -> Linux -> "No suitable terminal device found."
Okay, so here's the basic rundown in case you're too lazy to read that post. My 2.4.22 kernel runs beautifully while my 2.6.0-test6 (AND -test5 for that matter) both tell me "No suitable terminal device found" when I need to use Konsole/Xterm and that the program 'su' can't be found when I ever need to enter my root password. Any ideas? _________________ -Toraton |
|
Back to top |
|
|
meowsqueak Veteran
Joined: 26 Aug 2003 Posts: 1549 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've seen this come up before. Make sure your kernel has Unix98 PTY support compiled in (or as a module).
CONFIG_UNIX98_PTYS
From the kernel 'make menuconfig' help screen:
Quote: | A pseudo terminal (PTY) is a software device consisting of two
halves: a master and a slave. The slave device behaves identical to
a physical terminal; the master device is used by a process to
read data from and write data to the slave, thereby emulating a
terminal. Typical programs for the master side are telnet servers
and xterms. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
meowsqueak Veteran
Joined: 26 Aug 2003 Posts: 1549 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh and I forgot to mention, as you'll read in the 'help', make sure you enable "/dev/pts file system for Unix98 PTYs" too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ThE_TemPLaR Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 May 2003 Posts: 149 Location: Salon de Provence
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's enabled by default, isn't it ? _________________ ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
meowsqueak Veteran
Joined: 26 Aug 2003 Posts: 1549 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes it's enabled by default but I have seen this problem before where the user accidentally (or inadvertantly) disabled it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Toraton n00b
Joined: 29 Sep 2003 Posts: 17 Location: Federal Way, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wondered if that was it. Thanks a bunch!
I'll try it out soon and see how well it works. Also, one more quick question: Even though net.eth0 is added to my default runlevel I always have to dhcpcd eth0 by hand, and this is cumbersome. Is there any way (other than editing dhcpcd eth0 into the script) of making my card recognize on kernel loadup?
Thanks again. _________________ -Toraton |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|