| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BillyD
Guru
Joined: 05 May 2002
Posts: 323
Location: Australia
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 6:12 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Mystilleef wrote: |
I have the same problem. I compiled r2 without any hitches. But r3, makes me sigh every now and then. |
Bout the only suggestion I have seen is to increase the space portage uses to compile it. I haven't tried - the partition with my /var/tmp directory has 15Gb free space - surely that is enough...
I compiled the latest version of vanilla OO with no hassles - works fine.
Just wish I could build OO Ximian and actually have it work for once.
_________________
We used to have hominid cousins that were vegetarian. The palæontological record suggests that our ancestors killed them and ate them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arcangel
n00b
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have compilations problems with openoffice 1.1.0-r2 and ximian openoffice 1.1.46, this 2 ebuilds stop with the this message
=============
Building project external
=============
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.0-r1/work/oo_1.1_src/external/w4w
mkout -- version: 1.3
------------------------------
Making: ../unxlngi4.pro/misc/w4w.dpc
dmake subdmake=true -f makefile.mk product="full" depend=t ALLDPC
------------------------------
No Dependencies
-------------
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.0-r1/work/oo_1.1_src/external/gcc3_specific
gccinstlib.pl libstdc++.so."5" /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.0-r1/work/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/lib
printf (...) interpreted as function at /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.0-r1/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/bin/gccinstlib.pl line 75.
Foo at /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.0-r1/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/bin/gccinstlib.pl line 68.
dmake: Error code 255, while making '/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.0-r1/work/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/lib/libstdc++.so."5"'
---* TG_SLO.MK *---
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.0-r1/work/oo_1.1_src/external/gcc3_specific
!!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.1.0-r1 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 465, Exitcode 1
!!! Build failed!
anyone have one idea what happend?
I tried with a lot of flags combinations
CFLAGS="-mcpu=athlon-xp -O2"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -Os"
please help me 
I have an:
athlon-xp 2200+
1,5GB DDR 33Mhz
evms raid0 with 2,80GB disk ata 133
gentoo-dev-sources 2.6-beta9
gcc 3.3.2-r2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
infinyt9
n00b
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 26
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2003 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Did you just post this 15 times???
Anyway. Here is my openoffice-ximian experience.
1st try: Seg fault...
2nd try: Kernel oops
3rd try, got the binaries from BMG: error in librairies stating that I need glibc 2.3.3 (does that even exist!!!)
4th try: Seg fault
The hell with this crap, Ill just get the original version for petes sake!
I tried with rc1, and 1.1.46.... Im not really impressed right now
_________________
To understand recursion, you must first... understand recursion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ian!
Bodhisattva
Joined: 25 Feb 2003
Posts: 3829
Location: Essen, Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2003 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| infinyt9 wrote: | | Did you just post this 15 times??? |
No. It was about 20 times. I've cleaned it up now. Phew! 
ian!
_________________
"To have a successful open source project, you need to be at least somewhat successful at getting along with people." -- Daniel Robbins |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mystilleef
Guru
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 561
Location: Earth
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2003 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, r3 doesn't install the program folder /opt. Can anyone confirm this? Has anyone successfully compiled r3 without any problems? I'm beginning to regret trying to install r3.  r2 worked just fine.
_________________
simple, sleek and sexy text editor for gnome
"My logic is undeniable." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dreamer
Apprentice
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Posts: 236
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2003 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As you probably already know, Microsoft just announced "Availability of Open and Royalty-Free License For Office 2003 XML Reference Schemas"
( http://newsvac.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=03/11/17/1628248 )
The opinions vary.. Good? Bad? what do you guys think of it?
Especially in relation with our beloved OpenOffice.org of course  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
teilo
Apprentice
Joined: 20 Jun 2003
Posts: 276
Location: Minneapolis, MN
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My thought is that the open source community should ignore the Microsoft reference Schemas, and write their own.
This would prevent Microsoft from getting it's legal hooks into open source filter implementations.
_________________
Teilo who is called Teilo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Schizoid
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Apr 2003
Posts: 267
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jowilly wrote: |
On my P4 2.4 it was also slow until I changed 2 things:
1. umerged dmake to use OOo's internal dmake (the latest ebuild didn't build with it anyway, so I was force to remove it)
2. Build it with -O2 (removed -O3).
These are my CFLAGS:
| Code: | | CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -ffast-math -mfpmath=sse,387 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fprefetch-loop-arrays -fforce-addr -falign-functions=32" |
Now ximian-openoffice 1.1.46 is kickin' fast. |
Alright I finally got around to building 1.1.46 on my machine and it still behaves just the same. SLOOWWWWWW. I deleted ~/.openoffice, ~/.sversionrc, and /opt/OpenOffice.Org before I compiled this.
CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -pipe -mmmx -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse,387 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fthread-jumps -fforce-addr -frerun-cse-after-loop -frerun-loop-opt -fexpensive-optimizations -falign-functions=4 -falign-jumps=4"
USE="apm crypt libg++ libwww mikmod nls pdflib gdbm berkdb slang sdl gpm pam ssl perl qt motif mozilla X gtk gtk2 -gnome alsa -kde -arts aalib acpi avi cdr cjk cups dga dvd dvdr encode -esd fbcon gif imlib java jikes jpeg lirc mad mmx mpeg ncurses oggvorbis opengl -oss png python quicktime readline scanner -foomaticdb spell sse svga tiff truetype usb xmms xv zlib x86 tcpd xinerama xml xml2"
I do not have dev-util/dmake installed so I can only assume it used its own internal dmake.
It just takes it forever to draw any of the windows, like 45-60 seconds still. It is NOT using the cpu, it is just sitting there.
Maybe gtk needs to be rebuilt?!
Thanks for any advice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BillyD
Guru
Joined: 05 May 2002
Posts: 323
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dreamer wrote: | As you probably already know, Microsoft just announced "Availability of Open and Royalty-Free License For Office 2003 XML Reference Schemas"
( http://newsvac.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=03/11/17/1628248 )
The opinions vary.. Good? Bad? what do you guys think of it?
Especially in relation with our beloved OpenOffice.org of course |
Hope this doesn't sound to boorish, but that belongs in another thread in another forum. These threads get long enough and difficult enough to search as it is without discusson on (mostly) unrelated subjects included in them.
_________________
We used to have hominid cousins that were vegetarian. The palæontological record suggests that our ancestors killed them and ate them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dreamer
Apprentice
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Posts: 236
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BillyD wrote: | | dreamer wrote: | As you probably already know, Microsoft just announced "Availability of Open and Royalty-Free License For Office 2003 XML Reference Schemas"
( http://newsvac.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=03/11/17/1628248 )
The opinions vary.. Good? Bad? what do you guys think of it?
Especially in relation with our beloved OpenOffice.org of course |
Hope this doesn't sound to boorish, but that belongs in another thread in another forum. These threads get long enough and difficult enough to search as it is without discusson on (mostly) unrelated subjects included in them. |
Hmmz, i suppose you're right.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mystilleef
Guru
Joined: 27 Apr 2003
Posts: 561
Location: Earth
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jowilly
Guru
Joined: 22 Jun 2002
Posts: 319
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2003 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Schizoid wrote: | | Jowilly wrote: |
On my P4 2.4 it was also slow until I changed 2 things:
1. umerged dmake to use OOo's internal dmake (the latest ebuild didn't build with it anyway, so I was force to remove it)
2. Build it with -O2 (removed -O3).
These are my CFLAGS:
| Code: | | CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -ffast-math -mfpmath=sse,387 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fprefetch-loop-arrays -fforce-addr -falign-functions=32" |
Now ximian-openoffice 1.1.46 is kickin' fast. |
Alright I finally got around to building 1.1.46 on my machine and it still behaves just the same. SLOOWWWWWW. I deleted ~/.openoffice, ~/.sversionrc, and /opt/OpenOffice.Org before I compiled this.
CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -pipe -mmmx -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse,387 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fthread-jumps -fforce-addr -frerun-cse-after-loop -frerun-loop-opt -fexpensive-optimizations -falign-functions=4 -falign-jumps=4"
USE="apm crypt libg++ libwww mikmod nls pdflib gdbm berkdb slang sdl gpm pam ssl perl qt motif mozilla X gtk gtk2 -gnome alsa -kde -arts aalib acpi avi cdr cjk cups dga dvd dvdr encode -esd fbcon gif imlib java jikes jpeg lirc mad mmx mpeg ncurses oggvorbis opengl -oss png python quicktime readline scanner -foomaticdb spell sse svga tiff truetype usb xmms xv zlib x86 tcpd xinerama xml xml2"
I do not have dev-util/dmake installed so I can only assume it used its own internal dmake.
It just takes it forever to draw any of the windows, like 45-60 seconds still. It is NOT using the cpu, it is just sitting there.
Maybe gtk needs to be rebuilt?!
Thanks for any advice. |
Well... I don't know what your problem could be, but why dont you use -ffast-math in your CFLAGS ? It's the flag which gives the most speedups (the other appart from -fomit-frame-pointer don't do much in term of usability speed).
My whole system is built with -ffast-math, nothing broke so far.
I don't think this would solve your problem, but it could help a bit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
davecs
Guru
Joined: 08 Nov 2003
Posts: 436
Location: Dagenham, GB
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2003 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since installing Gentoo about two weeks ago, I have rebuilt a more customised kernel and did an "emerge sync" then rebuilt KDE rather than use the prebuilt version on the Gentoo discs. The only original (read "general purpose") builds I have now are X, Gnome (because I rarely use it) and ... OpenOffice.
I didn't even bother to download the Gentoo build I just used the official OOo binary build I already had from www.openoffice.org web site.
Things is, having read some of the posts above, I timed how long it takes to load OpenOffice after a reboot, and after OO has been run at least once and closed since the last KDE restart. The times are 15 seconds and 5 seconds respsectively.
I have a XP2200+ processor with 512Mb ram.
Since switching to Gentoo, I have notice incredible speed differences thanks to the custom building of critical programs. However, not with OO, or at least the critical factor in this case is not OO itself.
So I hate to put a dampener on everyone trying to custom-build this and tweaking all the flags, if my bogstandard version can load that fast, maybe you're attacking the wrong problem.
_________________
Gentoo, PCLOS-pre-81a and Windows 98SE.
Shuttle SN41G2V2
Athlon XP2500+ o/c to 3200+, 2x256Mb Geil Value RAM, FX5200.
Ntlworld cable internet via ethernet
and PC-Chips Desknote Laptop (with PCLOS-pre-81a ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Schizoid
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Apr 2003
Posts: 267
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2003 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow! I rebuilt gtk+ and now it is super fast!
:krad: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xlyz
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2002
Posts: 1470
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2003 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| davecs wrote: | Things is, having read some of the posts above, I timed how long it takes to load OpenOffice after a reboot, and after OO has been run at least once and closed since the last KDE restart. The times are 15 seconds and 5 seconds respsectively.
I have a XP2200+ processor with 512Mb ram. |
loading oocalc: 11" 1/2 first time, 4" 1/4 second time
p4 2.4, 512M ram
cflag: -02
I imagine that also hd performance could have an impact |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
george
n00b
Joined: 12 Jun 2002
Posts: 67
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm trying out 1.1.46 and I want to use a jdbc driver but can't make it work. Has anyone succeeded?
Looking round, a few things look like they may be relevant. Again, anyone know for sure?
The settings, security enable java checkbox clears itself when closing preferences. Does this mean I can't enable java?
Looking at the ebuild, configure has -disable-java and the user setup has no java. Again does this mean no java?
I would try changing these but at a day to build, I'd rather ask first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MG-Cloud
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 200
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2003 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone else having problems with bullets?
(I'm using openoffice-ximian in portage)
Graphic bullets work, numbered lists, work, and bullets seem to work except they don't output the bullet (they just indent). Anyone have/had this problem or know how I'd go about fixing it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fissile
Guru
Joined: 23 Nov 2003
Posts: 470
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2003 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
hey ppl just need a little push in the right direction, how do i know what my "PORTDIR_OVERLAY" is... i don' thave a portage folder in /usr/local/ and i can't even extract it their... | Quote: | No this ain't no joke at all - the ebuild for openoffice-ximian-1.1.0 is here! Get it while it's hot:
http://www.t0.or.at/~zaurus/openoffice-ximian-1.1.0-r3.tar.gz
The usual How-to install:
Just download it and extract to /usr/local/portage (or whereever you set your PORTDIR_OVERLAY to). After that
| Code: | | emerge openoffice-ximian |
and wait for some hours.
|
let me know if u have the answer.. i need this app badly...
_________________
The Only Thing Necessary for The Triumph of evil is for Good Men To do Nothing!... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xlyz
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2002
Posts: 1470
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2003 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Fissile wrote: | hey ppl just need a little push in the right direction, how do i know what my "PORTDIR_OVERLAY" is... i don' thave a portage folder in /usr/local/ and i can't even extract it their...
let me know if u have the answer.. i need this app badly... |
"PORTDIR_OVERLAY" is set in /etc/make.conf
btw you don't need it for ximian openoffice: now it's in portage!!! | Code: | [M~ ] app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.1.0 (0)
[M~ ] app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.1.0-r1 (0)
[M~I] app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.1.46 (0)
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
george
n00b
Joined: 12 Jun 2002
Posts: 67
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2003 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| george wrote: | | Looking at the ebuild, configure has -disable-java and the user setup has no java. Again does this mean no java? |
I've looked at configure --help and it means exactly what it says on the tin.
I've changed the ebuild to try it out and I'm rebuilding. It'd be done by now but I let my disk fill up so it didn't finish  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rincewind
Apprentice
Joined: 16 Aug 2002
Posts: 172
Location: Essen, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I just finished 1.1.46 but it was not installed to /opt but there is a complete copy in /var/tmp/portage/oo../image.
I can´t copy the failure message cause my xterm fucked up but the last output was something like a summary from strip.
At first glance it seems to be fully functional has anyone an explanation what happened here ?
Rincewind |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
my_nick
n00b
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 28
Location: Slovenia
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2003 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why aren't all languages, that are supported by OOo in the ebuild?
I'm interested in LANGUAGE="50" - slovenian.
Tnx |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poormanscomputer
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 04 May 2002
Posts: 114
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Does anyone have a binary of the OpenOffice-Ximian-1.1.46 version? Also, I heard somewhere you can change the theme with the Ximianized version...anyone know how?
Thanks,
poorman
BTW, I found a .tbz2 of a openoffice-ximian binary from a gentoo developer, but I think it is a ppc version, cause I can't seem to get it to work. Here's the link:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~darkspecter/packages/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lovechild
Advocate
Joined: 17 May 2002
Posts: 2858
Location: Århus, Denmark
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 1.1.47.3 is out, renaming the ebuild seems to work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sfabius
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 15 Nov 2002
Posts: 80
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2003 7:51 pm Post subject: ximian openoffice unmerges non-ximian OO? |
|
|
| Do I need to unmerge non-ximian OO (openoffice-bin in my case) before emerging openoffice-ximian? No, I don't want to use openoffice-bin again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Desktop Environments
