| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Turtleggjp
n00b
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 18
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 11:22 pm Post subject: DNS Lookup failure on some websites |
 |
|
I just finished doing a new Gentoo install on my old Core2 Duo system. During the install, I had some issues with it not being able to download all of the source packages that it needed. It seemed to have a problem resolving distfiles.gentoo.org. I eventually got around this issue by adding a bunch of mirrors to my /etc/portage/make.conf file. Now that I have built KDE 4.8.3 and also installed Firefox, I am again finding that some websites work just fine, while others it cannot find. A good example is Yahoo:
works just fine but,
does not.
Something strange definitely happened about a year ago when I replaced my DSL modem. As soon as I did, my Gentoo system was unable to resolve any website addresses. The Gentoo LiveDVD also had the same problem (and still does to this day). Strangely, some other distros' live discs (like Ubuntu and Mint) do not have this problem. Windows machines on the same network also do not have any problems. I was able to get around this by adding the DNS server addresses reported by the DSL modem to my /etc/resolv.conf file (using /etc/resolv.conf.tail to append them every time I start the system). I did the same thing on the new install, and it does help since without it I get nothing. However there are still some addresses not working correctly (almost seems to be sites that do not start with www). Any ideas what might be wrong?
Matt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ali3nx
l33t
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 732
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some routers have a feature that will "proxy" dns requests through your router or modem instead of allowing a common nat translation. This feature is actually bad to use and why commercial network hardware vendors add this feature i'll both never agree with or understand as proxying dns is not how dns is designed to work.
dhcp servers should assign dns servers to end client nodes not a proxy. There's dozens of long convoluted documents about this in general networking theory that any network engineer is forced to understand that's not easy to completely explain. One of the devious benefits of having such a setup is being able to enforce dns hyjacking.
If you have this feature enabled you would see your router or modem as your dns server. If there's any way to disable this feature if that is the case i would recommend doing so and adding public dns servers to your dhcp records.
This may not be a complete solution to your issues but it's worth checking out.
_________________
Compiling Gentoo since version 1.4
Thousands of Gentoo Installs Completed
Emerged on every continent but Antarctica
Compile long and Prosper! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PaulBredbury
Watchman
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 7310
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Try suggestions in thread.
I always recommend to use BIND on the Linux PC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Turtleggjp
n00b
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, after adding those public DNS servers listed in that thread, it seems to be working now. Paul, what do you mean by "BIND?"
The IP that gets put into /etc/resolv.conf by dhcp is that of my DSL modem, not the router. The way things are set up now, my router and all the computers on the network get addresses of 192.168.2.*, while my DSL modem has an address of 192.168.1.254. Could that also be what causing the problem? Though I would think that such a problem would prevent me from pulling up the DSL modem's web interface, which I am able to do.
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PaulBredbury
Watchman
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 7310
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just google it.
Run the "route" command to see your routing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Turtleggjp
n00b
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is the new system:
| Code: | Matt-Gentoo-2012 turtleggjp # route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
default 192.168.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG 3 0 0 eth0
loopback localhost 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 lo
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 3 0 0 eth0 |
This is my existing system (on the same LAN):
| Code: | Matt-Gentoo Documents # route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 202 0 0 eth0
loopback * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default 192.168.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG 202 0 0 eth0 |
Everything look normal? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PaulBredbury
Watchman
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 7310
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Your new loopback doesn't look right to me.
I have on my PC (not Gentoo):
| Code: | | 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo |
Set up by:
| Code: | ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 &&
route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 dev lo |
Does "ping localhost" work? With a localhost entry in /etc/hosts also, of course. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Networking & Security
