| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:13 pm Post subject: \dev\disk\... disappeared after udev update [SOLVED] |
 |
|
udev update from 171-r10 to 197-r3, same kernel
also the driver for the UPS disappeared : bcmxcp_usb for USB pw5110
rolled back to udev 171-r10
Is it necessary to change anything on the kernel configuration?
Thanks
emerge --info
| Code: | Portage 2.1.11.31 (!../usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/amd64/10.0/server, gcc-4.6.3, glibc-2.15-r3, 3.6.11-gentoo x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: Linux-3.6.11-gentoo-x86_64-Intel-R-_Atom-TM-_CPU_D525_@_1.80GHz-with-gentoo-2.1
Timestamp of tree: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:30:01 +0000
ld GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.22
distcc 3.1 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu [enabled]
app-shells/bash: 4.2_p37
dev-lang/python: 2.7.3-r2, 3.2.3
dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.27.1
sys-apps/baselayout: 2.1-r1
sys-apps/openrc: 0.11.8
sys-apps/sandbox: 2.5
sys-devel/autoconf: 2.69
sys-devel/automake: 1.11.6
sys-devel/binutils: 2.22-r1
sys-devel/gcc: 4.6.3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.7.3
sys-devel/libtool: 2.4-r1
sys-devel/make: 3.82-r4
sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.6 (virtual/os-headers)
sys-libs/glibc: 2.15-r3
Repositories: gentoo
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
ACCEPT_LICENSE="*"
CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=atom -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt /usr/share/openvpn/easy-rsa"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/env.d /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d /etc/terminfo"
CXXFLAGS="-march=atom -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
DISTDIR="/mnt/archive/portage/distfiles"
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--autounmask=n"
FCFLAGS="-O2 -pipe"
FEATURES="assume-digests binpkg-logs config-protect-if-modified distcc distlocks ebuild-locks fixlafiles merge-sync metadata-transfer news parallel-fetch protect-owned sandbox sfperms strict unknown-features-warn unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch"
FFLAGS="-O2 -pipe"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://de-mirror.org/gentoo/ http://gentoo.tiscali.nl/ http://mirror.ovh.net/gentoo-distfiles/"
LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed"
MAKEOPTS="-j8"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT="/"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats --human-readable --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/mnt/archive/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="3dnow acpi amd64 apm bzip2 caps cracklib crypt cxx fontconfig gdbm gmp gpm iconv iproute2 ipv6 maildir mdev mmx multilib ncurses netlink nls nptl openmp pcre posix readline session sqlite sqlite3 sse sse2 sse3 ssl ssse3 threads truetype udev unicode xml zlib" APACHE2_MODULES="actions alias authz_host dir log_config mime rewrite unique_id vhost_alias" CURL_SSL="gnutls" ELIBC="glibc" KERNEL="linux" LINGUAS="en" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_2" USERLAND="GNU"
Unset: CPPFLAGS, CTARGET, INSTALL_MASK, LC_ALL, PORTAGE_BUNZIP2_COMMAND, PORTAGE_COMPRESS, PORTAGE_COMPRESS_FLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS, USE_PYTHON |
Last edited by Tender on Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VoidMage
Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 6196
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did you revdep-rebuild for libudev.so.0 after upgrade ?
Also, did you check if /usr/lib/udev is empty ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VoidMage wrote: | | Did you revdep-rebuild for libudev.so.0 after upgrade ? |
yes
| Quote: | | Also, did you check if /usr/lib/udev is empty ? |
/usr/lib/udev does not exists
Thanks VoidMage, this is the status of my system after the second trial of emerging udev-197-r3
I have no idea of how to proceed |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage
Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 6196
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Were there any warnings during udev build (i.e. regarding DEVTMPFS) ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't notice warning about that, this may be not enough:
cat /var/log/portage/elog/sys-fs\:udev-197-r3\:20130121-192826.log
| Code: | WARN: postinst
Upstream has removed the persistent-cd rules
generator. If you need persistent names for these devices,
place udev rules for them in /etc/udev/rules.d.
udev-197 and newer introduces a new method of naming network
interfaces. The new names are a very significant change, so
they are disabled by default on live systems.
Please see the contents of /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules for more
information on this feature.
You need to restart udev as soon as possible to make the upgrade go
into effect.
The method you use to do this depends on your init system.
Old versions of installed libraries were detected on your system.
In order to avoid breaking packages that depend on these old libs,
the libraries are not being removed. You need to run revdep-rebuild
in order to remove these old dependencies. If you do not have this
helper program, simply emerge the 'gentoolkit' package.
# revdep-rebuild --library '/lib64/libudev.so.0' && rm '/lib64/libudev.so.0'
LOG: postinst
For more information on udev on Gentoo, writing udev rules, and
fixing known issues visit:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/udev-guide.xml
|
grep "DEVTMP" .config -A 10 -B 10 | Code: |
CONFIG_HAVE_BPF_JIT=y
#
# Device Drivers
#
#
# Generic Driver Options
#
CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH="/sbin/hotplug"
CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y
CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT=y
CONFIG_STANDALONE=y
CONFIG_PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD=y
CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y
# CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL is not set
CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE=""
# CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_DEVRES is not set
# CONFIG_SYS_HYPERVISOR is not set
# CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES is not set
CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER=y
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage
Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 6196
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
What does 'udevadm info' print for 'sd*' nodes ?
Do you have any custom udev rules ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is the output with udev 171, 197 is not active at the moment, I will install 197 and repost
udevadm info --query=all --name=sdb | Code: |
P: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.3/0000:02:00.0/ata5/host4/target4:0:0/4:0:0:0/block/sdb
N: sdb
S: disk/by-id/ata-SAMSUNG_HM501II_S24QJ9AB200537
S: disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_SAMSUNG_HM501IIS24QJ9AB200537
S: disk/by-id/wwn-0x50024e920480c587
E: UDEV_LOG=3
E: DEVPATH=/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.3/0000:02:00.0/ata5/host4/target4:0:0/4:0:0:0/block/sdb
E: MAJOR=8
E: MINOR=16
E: DEVNAME=/dev/sdb
E: DEVTYPE=disk
E: SUBSYSTEM=block
E: ID_ATA=1
E: ID_TYPE=disk
E: ID_BUS=ata
E: ID_MODEL=SAMSUNG_HM501II
E: ID_MODEL_ENC=SAMSUNG\x20HM501II\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20
E: ID_REVISION=2AJ10010
E: ID_SERIAL=SAMSUNG_HM501II_S24QJ9AB200537
E: ID_SERIAL_SHORT=S24QJ9AB200537
E: ID_ATA_WRITE_CACHE=1
E: ID_ATA_WRITE_CACHE_ENABLED=1
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_HPA=1
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_HPA_ENABLED=1
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_PM=1
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_PM_ENABLED=1
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SECURITY=1
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SECURITY_ENABLED=0
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SECURITY_ERASE_UNIT_MIN=116
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SECURITY_ENHANCED_ERASE_UNIT_MIN=116
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SMART=1
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SMART_ENABLED=1
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_AAM=1
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_AAM_ENABLED=0
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_AAM_VENDOR_RECOMMENDED_VALUE=254
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_AAM_CURRENT_VALUE=0
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_PUIS=1
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_PUIS_ENABLED=0
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_APM=1
E: ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_APM_ENABLED=0
E: ID_ATA_DOWNLOAD_MICROCODE=1
E: ID_ATA_SATA=1
E: ID_ATA_SATA_SIGNAL_RATE_GEN2=1
E: ID_ATA_SATA_SIGNAL_RATE_GEN1=1
E: ID_ATA_ROTATION_RATE_RPM=5400
E: ID_WWN=0x50024e920480c587
E: ID_WWN_WITH_EXTENSION=0x50024e920480c587
E: ID_SCSI_COMPAT=SATA_SAMSUNG_HM501IIS24QJ9AB200537
E: ID_FS_UUID=585b8905-678e-fd09-4ce2-eaa7187f3dd8
E: ID_FS_UUID_ENC=585b8905-678e-fd09-4ce2-eaa7187f3dd8
E: ID_FS_UUID_SUB=439b1e2f-9afc-3239-649e-ad3d4946db14
E: ID_FS_UUID_SUB_ENC=439b1e2f-9afc-3239-649e-ad3d4946db14
E: ID_FS_LABEL=lowpower:0
E: ID_FS_LABEL_ENC=lowpower:0
E: ID_FS_VERSION=1.2
E: ID_FS_TYPE=linux_raid_member
E: ID_FS_USAGE=raid
E: DEVLINKS=/dev/disk/by-id/ata-SAMSUNG_HM501II_S24QJ9AB200537 /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_SAMSUNG_HM501IIS24QJ9AB200537 /dev/disk/by-id/wwn-0x50024e920480c587
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
this is the output with udev v.197
udevadm info --query=all --name=sdb
| Code: | P: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.3/0000:02:00.0/ata5/host4/target4:0:0/4:0:0:0/block/sdb
N: sdb
E: DEVNAME=/dev/sdb
E: DEVPATH=/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.3/0000:02:00.0/ata5/host4/target4:0:0/4:0:0:0/block/sdb
E: DEVTYPE=disk
E: MAJOR=8
E: MINOR=16
E: SUBSYSTEM=block |
I have only this little persistent net rules:
cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules | Code: |
# This file was automatically generated by the /lib64/udev/write_net_rules
# program, run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
#
# You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single
# line, and change only the value of the NAME= key.
# USB device 0x2001:0x3c05 (usb)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:80:c8:3a:cf:db", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1"
# PCI device 0x10ec:0x8168 (r8169)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="54:04:a6:6b:39:57", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage
Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 6196
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It gets more odd...
What does '/lib/udev/ata_id --export /dev/sdb' print ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VoidMage, thanks for the support
/lib/udev/ata_id --export /dev/sdb | Code: |
ID_ATA=1
ID_TYPE=disk
ID_BUS=ata
ID_MODEL=SAMSUNG_HM501II
ID_MODEL_ENC=SAMSUNG\x20HM501II\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20
ID_REVISION=2AJ10001
ID_SERIAL=SAMSUNG_HM501II_S24QJ9AB200537
ID_SERIAL_SHORT=S24QJ9AB200537
ID_ATA_WRITE_CACHE=1
ID_ATA_WRITE_CACHE_ENABLED=1
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_HPA=1
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_HPA_ENABLED=1
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_PM=1
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_PM_ENABLED=1
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SECURITY=1
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SECURITY_ENABLED=0
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SECURITY_ERASE_UNIT_MIN=116
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SECURITY_ENHANCED_ERASE_UNIT_MIN=116
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SMART=1
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_SMART_ENABLED=1
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_AAM=1
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_AAM_ENABLED=0
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_AAM_VENDOR_RECOMMENDED_VALUE=254
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_AAM_CURRENT_VALUE=0
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_PUIS=1
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_PUIS_ENABLED=0
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_APM=1
ID_ATA_FEATURE_SET_APM_ENABLED=0
ID_ATA_DOWNLOAD_MICROCODE=1
ID_ATA_SATA=1
ID_ATA_SATA_SIGNAL_RATE_GEN2=1
ID_ATA_SATA_SIGNAL_RATE_GEN1=1
ID_ATA_ROTATION_RATE_RPM=5400
ID_WWN=0x50024e920480c587
ID_WWN_WITH_EXTENSION=0x50024e920480c587 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Any other ideas? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage
Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 6196
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Any chance it's a separate /usr problem ?
The above output suggests udev is working correctly, but for some reason it didn't run at the right time and the rule didn't get applied. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Checked the journaled file system, recompiled all without problems, no way.
This system is a "production" home router, with few core components (pppoe, aiccu, openvpn, ssh, iptables, samba, dnsmasq, nfs, upsd), installed from scratch one year ago to migrate the services from an older 32 bit Gentoo system with more than five years of great service.
Come on, I don't believe that you (all people reading) are not able to help me. The problem is limited to a package, is reproducible (on my system) at will, back and forth. If I were a Gentoo developer I already solved the problem by myself, but I'm "only" a Gentoo user.
I will do all the tests you will suggest me EXCEPT to start from scratch again. Is too early to do so.
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Updated from udev-197-r3 to udev-197-r4, problem persists. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5941
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tender wrote: | Checked the journaled file system, recompiled all without problems, no way.
This system is a "production" home router, with few core components (pppoe, aiccu, openvpn, ssh, iptables, samba, dnsmasq, nfs, upsd), installed from scratch one year ago to migrate the services from an older 32 bit Gentoo system with more than five years of great service.
Come on, I don't believe that you (all people reading) are not able to help me. The problem is limited to a package, is reproducible (on my system) at will, back and forth. If I were a Gentoo developer I already solved the problem by myself, but I'm "only" a Gentoo user.
I will do all the tests you will suggest me EXCEPT to start from scratch again. Is too early to do so.
Thanks |
I'm only a gentoo user and not gentoo developer also, thing is, I pick my upgrades carefully, the forum is filled with udev-197 upgrade error which makes me wonder why the pkg isn't hardmasked.
you can try eudev or do what I do, stay with udev-171-r10 as long as possible.
since version 173 the whole pkg went crazy and I guess it will take some time for it to even start stabilizing again.
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SamuliSuominen
Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 2133
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
People have had issues with /dev/disk missing using genkernel made initramfs, which doesn't include udev. Some got it working using dracut made initramfs, which does come with udev.
Does that have any relevance to the issue? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ssuominen wrote: | People have had issues with /dev/disk missing using genkernel made initramfs, which doesn't include udev. Some got it working using dracut made initramfs, which does come with udev.
Does that have any relevance to the issue? |
Thanks ssuominen, I don't use genkernel and initramfs
| Code: | title Gentoo Linux 3.6.11-gentoo
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/bzImage-3.6.11 root=/dev/sda3 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jormartr
Apprentice
Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 174
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had some similar situation, reported on bug tracker, it is very similar to yours.
In my case, the source of the problem seemed to be the initramfs, but you have some similar problem without using it.
Do you have a similar udev debug output? To enable it, follow comment #3 on bug report. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DaggyStyle wrote: | | Tender wrote: | Checked the journaled file system, recompiled all without problems, no way.
This system is a "production" home router, with few core components (pppoe, aiccu, openvpn, ssh, iptables, samba, dnsmasq, nfs, upsd), installed from scratch one year ago to migrate the services from an older 32 bit Gentoo system with more than five years of great service.
Come on, I don't believe that you (all people reading) are not able to help me. The problem is limited to a package, is reproducible (on my system) at will, back and forth. If I were a Gentoo developer I already solved the problem by myself, but I'm "only" a Gentoo user.
I will do all the tests you will suggest me EXCEPT to start from scratch again. Is too early to do so.
Thanks |
I'm only a gentoo user and not gentoo developer also, thing is, I pick my upgrades carefully, the forum is filled with udev-197 upgrade error which makes me wonder why the pkg isn't hardmasked.
you can try eudev or do what I do, stay with udev-171-r10 as long as possible.
since version 173 the whole pkg went crazy and I guess it will take some time for it to even start stabilizing again. |
Thanks DaggyStyle,
now with v.193 I've reverted back all hard disk conf files using \dev\sd* and my software raid is up again, what is still missing is the UPS driver.
I will do more test in a new VM, I can't belive v.193 is no more capable to handle \dev\disk\..., if I get tired I will stay with v.171
And package fork confuse users always more... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage
Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 6196
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's an odd and a bit cryptic note in the old udev NEWS file:
| Quote: | Udev in initramfs should clean the state of the udev database
with: udevadm info --cleanup-db which will remove all state left
behind from events/rules in initramfs. If initramfs uses
--cleanup-db and device-mapper/LVM, the rules in initramfs need
to add OPTIONS+="db_persist" for all dm devices. This will
prevent removal of the udev database for these devices. |
It's for udev 168, so it should already have been in effect, but perhaps it wasn't till now.
 OK, so I am grasping at straws here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SamuliSuominen
Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 2133
Location: Finland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
grep "CONFIG_SYSFS" /usr/src/linux/.config
# CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is not set
CONFIG_SYSFS=y
grep "CONFIG_IDE" /usr/src/linux/.config
# CONFIG_IDE is not set |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SamuliSuominen
Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 2133
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DaggyStyle wrote: | | I'm only a gentoo user and not gentoo developer also, thing is, I pick my upgrades carefully, the forum is filled with udev-197 upgrade error which makes me wonder why the pkg isn't hardmasked. |
Haven't seen anything that would be an regression yet, just a lot of bad configs people have had and the threads have all ended up with "solved"
Or can you point me to an one? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SamuliSuominen
Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 2133
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tender wrote: |
grep "CONFIG_SYSFS" /usr/src/linux/.config
# CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is not set
CONFIG_SYSFS=y
grep "CONFIG_IDE" /usr/src/linux/.config
# CONFIG_IDE is not set |
And you are sure it's the same configuration as in the running kernel? I would trust /proc/config.gz a lot more, I don't understand why people don't use more:
CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y
CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=y
And you haven't done anything crazy like disabling USE="kmod" in sys-fs/udev that would prevent module loading? Be sure it's enabled. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tender
Apprentice
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 166
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | And you are sure it's the same configuration as in the running kernel? I would trust /proc/config.gz a lot more, I don't understand why people don't use more:
CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y
CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=y
And you haven't done anything crazy like disabling USE="kmod" in sys-fs/udev that would prevent module loading? Be sure it's enabled.
|
I do follow your hint about IKCONFIG from now on, I'm recompiling the kernel right now.
| Code: | equery u udev
[ Legend : U - final flag setting for installation]
[ : I - package is installed with flag ]
[ Colors : set, unset ]
* Found these USE flags for sys-fs/udev-197-r4:
U I
- - acl : Adds support for Access Control Lists
- - doc : Adds extra documentation (API, Javadoc, etc). It is recommended to enable per package instead of globally
- - gudev : enable libudev gobject interface
- - hwdb : read vendor/device string database and add it to udev database
- - introspection : Use dev-libs/gobject-introspection for introspection
- - keymap : map custom hardware's multimedia keys
- - kmod : enable udev to load kernel modules
- - openrc : install the OpenRC init scripts
- - static-libs : Build static libraries
|
But what about using USE="kmod" in udev, is it related to genkernel?
My kernel has NO modules.
Which modules udev v.197 depend from? udev v.171 was ok with the same kernel.
(Sorry for my stupid questions, if any) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Kernel & Hardware
