View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
amphibious Apprentice
Joined: 25 Sep 2003 Posts: 174 Location: boston, massachusetts, usa
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 2:28 am Post subject: Filesystem NOT cleanly unmounted |
|
|
Here's a message (not quite an error message I suppose... but worrisome) I get during boot up.
Code: | Checking root filesystem...
Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x303 of format 3.6 with standard journal
Blocks (total/free): 4496191/3424180 by 4096 bytes
Filesystem is NOT cleanly unmounted
Firesystem seems mounted read-only. Skipping journal replay
Checking internal tree..finished |
This doesn't happen every time I boot, probably 80% of the time. But I'd rather it not be there. Any ideas?
Thanks! _________________ http://amphibio.us |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
How do you normally shut the machine down?
Moved from Installing Gentoo. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
amphibious Apprentice
Joined: 25 Sep 2003 Posts: 174 Location: boston, massachusetts, usa
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
by clicking shut down.
Is that message an indication of it not properly shutting down? _________________ http://amphibio.us |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neenee Veteran
Joined: 20 Jul 2003 Posts: 1786
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
yes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sgaduuw Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 17 Sep 2002 Posts: 133 Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I had a similar problem back when I was using reiserfs, my system had lots of problems unmounting the reiserfs partitions at shutdown (about 75% chance of failure). I was never really able to find a good sollution for this problem, and never really trusted reiserfs again. I converted my filesystems to JFS to see if that would give me problems but never had any problems unmounting partitions again, so I'll stick to JFS _________________ my website |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paroneayea Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Oct 2003 Posts: 87
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2003 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been having this problem, and it's really starting to worry me. I've noticed one other possibly related error at startup... my "DMA does not appear to be turned on"...
I've tried issuing the command
Code: | hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda |
ah, but no success do I get... instead I get a rather disheartening message:
Code: | /dev/hda:
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
using_dma = 0 (off) |
Do you get the same problem? I can't understand why this would be happening, but the two do indeed seem related. _________________ I make comics. Read them. They are good for your soul.
http://www.lingocomic.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
so Retired Dev
Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Posts: 115 Location: Roma
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2003 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paroneayea wrote: |
Code: | /dev/hda:
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
using_dma = 0 (off) |
|
support of your chipset isn't in your kernel
go and put it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paroneayea Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Oct 2003 Posts: 87
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks... but how do I tell what chipset I need? (Is it specific to my hard drive?) _________________ I make comics. Read them. They are good for your soul.
http://www.lingocomic.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paroneayea Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Oct 2003 Posts: 87
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nevermind... I figured out what to do
that gave me the information I needed. _________________ I make comics. Read them. They are good for your soul.
http://www.lingocomic.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
b0fh Guru
Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 426
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm getting that annoying error on two of my PCs every time at boot, too, although my system seems to shutdown corretly. Did you find any solution to this yet? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sumC n00b
Joined: 15 Nov 2002 Posts: 72 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
vbenares Apprentice
Joined: 13 Aug 2003 Posts: 205
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know this is dumb, but what does one do with the /etc/init.d/halt.sh linked to the bug report? Just download and copy it to the correct directory? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
b0fh Guru
Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 426
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vbenares wrote: | I know this is dumb, but what does one do with the /etc/init.d/halt.sh linked to the bug report? Just download and copy it to the correct directory? |
I say this will do the trick! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dirtboy Apprentice
Joined: 12 Dec 2002 Posts: 263 Location: Pascagoula, MS
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2003 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's a little more to it than that. You need to be root to be able to copy it over, then you have to make sure it has execute permissions.
chmod 755 /etc/init.d/halt.sh |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|