View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dmpogo Advocate
![Advocate Advocate](/images/ranks/rank-G-1-advocate.gif)
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 3468 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 4:29 am Post subject: [SOLVED] oldest kernel compatible with udev-204 |
|
|
I 'accidently' did a udev upgrade on my old venerable server that runs 2.6.32 kernel, and now in doubt whether I can stay with this kernel,
or have to upgrade. I somehow like 2.6.32, it served me well for years, and I enjoy seeing < 100000 timer interrupts accumulated over a year in comparison with
millions per day on modern kernels (tickless system in both cases).
As and alternative, I consider swithing to static /dev , but not sure how to proceed without errors (server is remote and I have one reboot chance without
having to drive to see it in person). Is there any guide ?
Last edited by dmpogo on Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:44 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
rh1 Guru
![Guru Guru](/images/ranks/rank_rect_3.gif)
![](images/avatars/15296152594bc0433c125f1.gif)
Joined: 10 Apr 2010 Posts: 501
|
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
According to the udev-204 ebuild, the lowest compatible kernel version is 2.6.32 so you should be fine. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
SamuliSuominen Retired Dev
![Retired Dev Retired Dev](/images/ranks/rank-retired.gif)
Joined: 30 Sep 2005 Posts: 2133 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
rh1 is correct, we patch support for 2.6.32 back to sys-fs/udev and both 204 and 206 should be good to go |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
dmpogo Advocate
![Advocate Advocate](/images/ranks/rank-G-1-advocate.gif)
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 3468 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks ! |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/gentoo/images/spacer.gif) |
|