View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Letharion Veteran
Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 1344 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:57 pm Post subject: Has ARM become unsupported? |
|
|
Looking at the ARM docs, they have this at the top:
Quote: | Disclaimer : This document is not valid and is not maintained anymore. |
Am I not finding the existing newer documentation, or has ARM simply lost it's maintainers and is now unsupported? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eccerr0r Watchman
Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 9824 Location: almost Mile High in the USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I heard that ARM machines have gotten so disjoint from each other that basically they either need their own distro or at least some kernel that requires to know every single nook and cranny each possible ARM SOC has. If someone else knows more about them, please comment, but it seems it's nowhere near how like all PCs are close enough that they can boot from the same kernel, all depends are on disk drivers (which a lot are the same too)...
It's become throwaway hardware... *sigh* The software follows with the hardware... _________________ Intel Core i7 2700K/Radeon R7 250/24GB DDR3/256GB SSD
What am I supposed watching? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
axl Veteran
Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 1146 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:34 pm Post subject: raspberry pi |
|
|
i just finished. it took about a week, but i'm done.
raspberry pi is an arm arch. i had no problem installing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xaviermiller Bodhisattva
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 Posts: 8719 Location: ~Brussels - Belgique
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had no problem on a Pandaboard, and I still have zero problem on a raspberry pi rev A (256Mb RAM). _________________ Kind regards,
Xavier Miller |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cwr Veteran
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 Posts: 1969
|
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Works on Beaglebone Black as well - both cross-compiling and building packages natively.
Will |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shodanx n00b
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I'm trying to install gentoo on a Allwinner A13-based tablet but I'm having a hard time just finding out where to begin. The gentoo ARM handbook only specifies how to install via netboot which is not an option on this tablet (wifi is the only networking option). I believe I can put a specially named file on a microsd card and it will attempt booting it, but there doesn't appear to be a gentoo arm livesd(?) image anywhere ?
Any insight into this ? I think gentoo is the perfect OS to thinker with this without having to wait for someone else to prepare whatever app you need for you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chithanh Developer
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Posts: 2158 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Specially named file means kernel image? If so, then cross compile a kernel (possibly with built-in command line) and place it on the microSD card, along with an extracted stage3.
For instructions on cross-compiling the kernel, see http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/handbook/
Allwinner still need specially patched kernels I think, so you cannot use gentoo-sources. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cwr Veteran
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 Posts: 1969
|
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are various types of ARM CPU, and I can't keep track of them, but building for a TI BeagleBone Black
was relatively straightforward. The hard part was building a working cross-compiler (crossdev is fine, but
various patches are still needed). I also found a Stage 3 file for the right ARM CPU; it was then just
a question of cross-compiling the extra stuff I needed.
The kernel sources themselves are nothing to do with Gentoo - they are based on Linux stable, and patched
with a specific set of patches; you'll have to find the equivalent for your CPU.
Some packages can't be cross-compiled, either because of their special build process (Python), or because their
Autotools setup is broken. Once I had a shell up I simply compiled those on the target machine.
Will |
|
Back to top |
|
|
depontius Advocate
Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 3522
|
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By way of general information...
From regular reading of LKML the collective mess called the ARM architectures is well recognized, and there has been a concerted effort underway for some time now to fix that up. As others have said, it's not so much the ARM CPU as it is the rest of the ARM SOC stuff. But even that's getting fixed. Look in on some of the "device tree" (not sure if that's one word or two) discussion for more information. Obviously this work is ongoing, and equally obviously it not present on older kernels. But there's hope. _________________ .sigs waste space and bandwidth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
schorsch_76 Guru
Joined: 19 Jun 2012 Posts: 452
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
chithanh wrote: | Specially named file means kernel image? If so, then cross compile a kernel (possibly with built-in command line) and place it on the microSD card, along with an extracted stage3.
For instructions on cross-compiling the kernel, see http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/handbook/
Allwinner still need specially patched kernels I think, so you cannot use gentoo-sources. |
Allwinner SoC is supported by mainline kernel since 3.14 . Beaglebone Black is also supported by mainline Kernel since 3.14. I own a BBB my own and run a vanilla 3.14.4 Kernel on it. The Allwinner i dont own, but from my research results, i remember that it is supported. Just grep the kenrel mainline log for Allwinner.
The infrastructure seems to be changed. The main reason for the big arm missery was the devicetree stuff. You can see what platforms are supported if you grep through the arm arch directory and search for the dtb (device tree) files. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|