Compiling i386 binaries in a amd64 world?

blietaer · Tux's lil' helper Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 103

Hello,

My Gentoo Box is ~amd64/Xfce4 and I love it.
But my current job would be developing i386 binaries for embedded platforms.

As specifying '-m32' in gcc and having the correct /usr/lib32/*.so in the Makefile seems to be enough and do the trick so far, I would like to avoid going for a 32-chroot and/or a i386 crossdev environment (avoidable? pain?) and/or a virtual i386 machine (already have, but would be so cool to develop natively in my gentoo env,)...

The thing is, I am not sur how/(if?) I want/should/could emerge specific *32* version of libraries.
I *guess* having a /usr/lib32 is the whole point of the game, but is it what I would like to achieve ?
(Copying manually my *.so from the original i386 Debian dev VBox seems so lame/dangerous to me...)

krinn · Watchman Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 7470

To avoid any mess or troubles, why not add a 32bits dev env itself, it's not like your cpu wasn't able to handle it. Or build a virtual env if you prefer.

Per example newer kernels have drop i386 support, so even in a 32bits env, calls to kernel won't warrant you made i386 valid programs, only valid 32bits one.
So your env need a specific kernel...
And if you are doing tools for i386 only, then it would be bad to see your i386 program is in fact not working.

I'm not sure how you use the term: are you really aiming at i386 code or state "i386" wrongly use it for "32bits" (i686 is also 32bits, and it was that even before 64bits appears).

blietaer · Tux's lil' helper Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 103

This is very valuable inputs.

1./ I am indeed wrongly messing around i386/i686/32bits.

2./ Today development is performed in a virtual Debian i386 (I insist) that is indeed 32 bits, but my goal is to be able to get closest to these i386 (and thus, old) libraries, so the generated binaries could actually 'run' in this debian environement (similar to the board env)

3./ what do you mean 'why not add a 32bits dev env itself'?
--> this is more probably what I want to achieve...but it is not clear for me: any 'howto's' available?

4./ In a way, I guess I am not sure what I am doing and what I need to do, but my guess is that many people went down that road more than twice...

krinn · Watchman Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 7470

I mean build a gentoo with i386, and try to use gcc/glibc/kernel used by the debian.
That's if you really wish gentoo, as it's seem easier to install the debian you have in the embed system.
In both cases you've end with a special env that is the same as the embed system. But that will be run by your amd64 cpu (lol not really the same as a real i386 or an embed cpu).

Have a look at :
- http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/handbook/
Where you can see others possibilities discuss, cross compiling, virtual env... So may fit your case

Or i would go with :
http://mirrors.mit.edu/gentoo-distfiles/releases/x86/autobuilds/current-stage3-i486/
i486 is close enough arch to your target arch (so this should make sure it comes with a toolchain that should works with i386).
Then read up : https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Changing_the_CHOST_variable

Once done, just not forget to package.mask toolchain to keep it under a version that will be compatible with your embed system (yes, this mean it could also prevent you from using certain programs version that need feature you cannot provide : ie forget a udev version that might need a kernel option not provide by the kernel version you must use, and then restrict xfce version if it depends on udev version...).

szatox · Advocate Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 3432

I tend to use 32 bit userspace tools inside a chroot jail on my amd64 when I have to do something 32-bit and it works fine. Neither 64 bit kernel nor 32 bit tools complain.

blietaer · Tux's lil' helper Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 103

@krinn> so you _really_ mean like a dual boot gentoo i386?

krinn · Watchman Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 7470

Yes, your cpu can run in 32bits and run i386 code. So why not use it to run the same env, it will be just faster. I would take different options if the cpu wasn't able to do that.
Virtualization or really creating a dual boot will remove the pain at handling difference the running env and the dev env may have : libraries, headers... If the dev env == the running env, things get easier.

blietaer · Tux's lil' helper Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 103

OK, but that is too close to having the whole exact Debian in a VM and/or dual boot... I wish I could really benefit from my super-customized ~amd64 install, with all my settings and so AND having a terminal in wich I could compile my x86 stuffs, with the right libs...

i92guboj · Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 1:04 pm Post subject:

blietaer · Tux's lil' helper Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 103

i92guboj · Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:52 pm Post subject:

Well. The procedure to get cross-toolchains is well documented.

What I mean is that, while in some other more exotic arches like arm you have to go combining the toolchain components versions so that the components will compile and produce working binaries, in x86 and amd64 (being these two the more actively maintained architectures in Gentoo) you just have to stick to whatever is stable in either of the two, and you can then safely produce a toolchain for the other without much hassle.

There can be small issues here and there, but nothing to hold your breathe about.

Just pick the Gentoo guides and start experimenting

The actual reference guide for crossdev in Gentoo is this:

http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/handbook/